Skip to main content

On the Nature of Taste and Whether It Can Be Learned

At some point, most people encounter someone whose sense of style, fashion, or decor feels consistently off. At first, this is easy to dismiss as a matter of preference. Taste is subjective, we tell ourselves. But when poor taste recurs across different contexts, it raises a more unsettling question. What exactly is taste? How does good taste develop? Why do some people seem unable to acquire it? Good taste is often misunderstood as trend awareness or personal expression. In reality, it is something far more restrained and disciplined. Good taste is the ability to recognize proportion, coherence, and intention within a given context. It reflects an understanding of relationships between elements rather than attachment to any single element. People with good taste notice balance, scale, rhythm, and absence. They sense when something is excessive, distracts from its purpose, or draws attention to itself unnecessarily. Most importantly, they adapt their choices to context. What works in o...

A Biblical Distinction Between Holiness and Perfection

The difference between holiness and perfection is often blurred in modern theology, yet both Scripture and classical philosophy treat them as distinct concepts that answer fundamentally different questions. At its core, perfection concerns completeness or fulfillment. In the classical tradition associated with Aristotle and later Aquinas, perfection is teleological, meaning it is end-directed. A thing is perfect when it fully actualizes what it is meant to be. Perfection is therefore comparative and measurable relative to a standard, and it answers a specific question. Is anything missing? A perfect circle lacks none of the properties required to be a circle. A perfect knife fulfills its cutting purpose without deficiency. This understanding aligns closely with the New Testament’s use of the Greek word teleios (τέλειος), which means complete, mature, or brought to its intended end. Jesus uses this term in Matthew 5:48 (NIV), which says, “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” Likewise, James defines perfection explicitly in James 1:4 (NIV): “Let perseverance finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.” In both cases, perfection is framed as growth toward fullness. It is developmental language describing a process of becoming rather than a declaration of belonging.

Holiness, however, operates in a different category. Biblically, holiness is not primarily about completion but about set apartness and relation. The Hebrew word qādôš (קָדוֹשׁ) means set apart, consecrated, or belonging uniquely to God. Holiness is qualitative rather than scalar and relational rather than functional. It answers a different question altogether. To whom does this belong? This is made explicit in God’s declaration to Israel in Leviticus 20:26 (NIV): “You are to be holy to me because I, the LORD, am holy, and I have set you apart from the nations to be my own.” A similar declaration appears in Exodus 19:5-6 (NIV): “Now if you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all nations you will be my treasured possession. Although the whole earth is mine, you will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” Israel is declared holy not because of moral consistency but because God has chosen and claimed them. Their long and repeated cycles of rebellion and repentance undermine any claim to moral perfection, yet they never negate Israel’s holiness. Biblically, holiness is grounded in belonging and consecration, not moral completeness.

This distinction becomes even clearer when Scripture applies holiness to things that lack moral capacity altogether. God sanctifies time, space, and objects without reference to improvement or excellence. In Genesis 2:3 (NIV), we read, “Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.” Likewise, in Exodus 30:29 (NIV), God commands, “You shall consecrate them so they will be most holy, and whatever touches them will be holy.” Days, altars, utensils, and sacred spaces are holy not because they perform better than others but because they are set apart for God’s purposes. Objects do not act, choose, or improve morally, which makes it clear that holiness is not a measure of excellence or completeness. It is relational and vocational.

The New Testament extends this logic to people. Believers are called holy while still being deeply imperfect. Paul opens his letter to the Corinthians by addressing them in 1 Corinthians 1:2 (NIV) as “those sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be his holy people.” Yet only two chapters later, he rebukes them sharply in 1 Corinthians 3:1 through 3 (NIV): “Brothers and sisters, I could not address you as people who live by the Spirit but as people who are still worldly, mere infants in Christ. I gave you milk, not solid food, for you were not yet ready for it. Indeed, you are still not ready. You are still worldly. For since there is jealousy and quarreling among you, are you not worldly?” Paul affirms their holiness while condemning their immaturity. This would be incoherent if holiness required moral perfection. Holiness is something believers are given and called into, not something earned through performance.

Scripture consistently holds holiness and perfection together without collapsing them. Believers are already holy yet still moving toward perfection. Hebrews 10:14 (NIV) states, “For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.” Paul echoes this tension in Philippians 3:12 (NIV): “Not that I have already obtained all this, or have already arrived at my goal, but I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me.” Holiness is positional and relational. Perfection is teleological and progressive. One is given. The other is pursued.

God alone is both perfectly complete and perfectly holy in a way creatures are not. In Isaiah 6:3 (NIV), the seraphim cry out, “Holy, holy, holy is the LORD Almighty; the whole earth is full of his glory.” The threefold repetition intensifies God’s otherness rather than performance. God is not merely the most morally excellent being on a shared scale with humanity. He is categorically different. This is reinforced in Habakkuk 1:13 (NIV): “Your eyes are too pure to look on evil; you cannot tolerate wrongdoing.” God’s holiness names His ontological distinction as the source of all being. His perfection flows from the fact that He lacks nothing. Human beings can be holy only by relationship and can approach perfection only through growth.

From Scripture, a clear pattern emerges. Holiness means being set apart, consecrated, and belonging to God. Perfection means being complete, mature, and lacking nothing. Holiness can be given instantly. Perfection unfolds over time. Confusing the two collapses grace into achievement and turns holiness into a performance metric. Biblically speaking, holiness is about being claimed by God, while perfection is about being formed into fullness and pursuing the character of God.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

220 Dolch Words & ASL Sign Language

Teaching my daughter to read, I discover that the shorter the word the more rules it is likely to break. Phonetics seems to make little since. Digging deeper I discover that the teaching technique for reading is to focus on both memorization & phonetics, leading me to Dolch words. On a side note, I have become a big advocate of sign language as a teaching aid to understanding both in communication & logic. While teaching her Dolch words via flash cards, I notice that giving her a sign helps her remember. She sometimes remembers just the sign and other times the English word. Baffling to me, teaching her more made learning easier & understanding quicker. She knows the 220 Dolch words and should achieve the speed I desire by Christmas before we begin the Dolch Nouns. She is 4 & a half years old. A lot of patience and focus on keeping learning interesting has propelled my daughter who has already read 6 different books on her own (Biscuit, Green Eggs & Ham, Time to Get...

Statement of Faith: The Unexpected

According to my parents, I was saved at the age of 3. I said the words. I did the deed. But really . . . 3? I loved going to church. Participating in all things church, I didn’t know what was outside of church. My life was great. Who wouldn’t want to be a Christian like everyone else? I am not saying I wasn’t saved but I don’t believe that I knew what I was doing. I believe the turning point in my life was at the age of 12. It was almost as if I realized my independence. I had been sponsored to go to a youth camp that was centered on serving in Engeltal Valley in Arkansas. ETH held a youth camp attended by 12 youth. We mowed the grounds, cooked the food, cleaned the facilities, and worshiped the Lord. At an evening service, the minister said there were 3 people in the room that needed to ask the Lord in their heart. I knew everyone there and they were saved. They were part of the Team. Who goes to a Christian work camp if they are not there to serve God? Two immediately went up to ask ...

Food Allergies and Preferences: Working Fearlessly with your Picky Eater.

I have searched for food allergy information through CDC (Center for Disease Control), FAAN (Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network), FAI (Food Allergy Initiative), NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), AAAAI (American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology), and many other sites. Honestly of all the research I have done this one seems to have the most variance. I couldn't find government issued statistics on food allergies. It seems that the science of food allergies is still progressing and is timid of making bold generalizations. In general 4% to 8% of all children have a food allergy. 90% of these allergies are from the big 7: Milk, Eggs, Soy, Wheat, Peanut, Tree Nut, and Seafood. Around 70% of children grow out of their food allergies before age 5. These foods should be avoided before the age of 1. Of the 350 million people in America only 100 die each year of food allergies. Although food allergies are not much of a death risk, the connection to Ast...